<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyrighting Colours?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordsoftheweb.com/2009/11/copyrighting-colours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordsoftheweb.com/2009/11/copyrighting-colours/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:04:12 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://wordsoftheweb.com/2009/11/copyrighting-colours/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordsoftheweb.com/?p=185#comment-89</guid>
		<description>I feel that while colours should most definitely not be trademarked, they could be labeled (eg: &quot;Home Depot Orange&quot;). If anything, these brands should be grateful for the added exposure this would bring any time someone uses their specific shade, instead of trying to restrict and punish people for it.

If this type of practice escalates, the potential backlash of negative word-of-mouth response will surely far outweigh the gains sought through legal action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that while colours should most definitely not be trademarked, they could be labeled (eg: &#8220;Home Depot Orange&#8221;). If anything, these brands should be grateful for the added exposure this would bring any time someone uses their specific shade, instead of trying to restrict and punish people for it.</p>
<p>If this type of practice escalates, the potential backlash of negative word-of-mouth response will surely far outweigh the gains sought through legal action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carson</title>
		<link>http://wordsoftheweb.com/2009/11/copyrighting-colours/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordsoftheweb.com/?p=185#comment-58</guid>
		<description>I agree, Kevin. Copyrighting a colour is like Apple trademarking anything remotely resembling an Apple.
If I&#039;m reading it correctly, a company could own the colour but anyone could use it? If that&#039;s the case, I like it. The owning company would get the exposure and would not limit other designers.

Great idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Kevin. Copyrighting a colour is like Apple trademarking anything remotely resembling an Apple.<br />
If I&#8217;m reading it correctly, a company could own the colour but anyone could use it? If that&#8217;s the case, I like it. The owning company would get the exposure and would not limit other designers.</p>
<p>Great idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://wordsoftheweb.com/2009/11/copyrighting-colours/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordsoftheweb.com/?p=185#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I feel that while colours should most definitely not be trademarked, they could be labeled (eg: &quot;Home Depot Orange&quot;). If anything, these brands should be grateful for the added exposure this would bring any time someone uses their specific shade, instead of trying to restrict and punish people for it.

If this type of practice escalates, the potential backlash of negative word-of-mouth response will surely far outweigh the gains sought through legal action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that while colours should most definitely not be trademarked, they could be labeled (eg: &#8220;Home Depot Orange&#8221;). If anything, these brands should be grateful for the added exposure this would bring any time someone uses their specific shade, instead of trying to restrict and punish people for it.</p>
<p>If this type of practice escalates, the potential backlash of negative word-of-mouth response will surely far outweigh the gains sought through legal action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
